Choose the review level
Select verification of an existing AI output, validation with an independent omission search, or a comprehensive workflow beginning with raw records.
A defined clinical review workflow
From AI output—or raw records—to findings your litigation team can evaluate.
Sierra Pacific can validate a summary, chronology, or extracted findings your platform already produced. For comprehensive assignments, Sierra Pacific begins with the raw record, runs the AI-assisted analysis workflow, and clinically validates the resulting work product.
InputExisting AI output or raw records
ScopeDefined clinical question
ReviewIndependent RN validation
OutputSupported findings and limitations
The review sequence
Four steps, with scope established before records move.
Define the clinical question
Identify the matter context, the existing AI output when applicable, and the clinical issue that should guide the review.
Confirm scope and transfer
Sierra Pacific confirms the fee, turnaround, and deliverable before records move through the approved protected workflow.
Receive validated findings
The litigation team receives RN-reviewed findings that distinguish supported content, needed context, and material concerns.
What the RN evaluates
Clinical meaning lives between the extracted facts.
The review follows sequence, response, escalation, contradiction, and functional change—not only whether a term appears in the chart.
Timeline and treatment relationships
Medication changes and response
Nursing observations
Laboratory and imaging trends
Treatment escalation or deterioration
Conflicting documentation
Functional status and follow-up
Clinically significant omissions
What to prepare
Enough context to scope the right review.
AI work product or raw records
Provide the summary, chronology, or findings to validate—or select Comprehensive Clinical Validation when Sierra Pacific should begin with the raw record.
Clinical question
The injury, treatment issue, causation question, standard-of-care concern, or other defined focus.
Matter parameters
Approximate page count, deadline, record condition, and any citation or deliverable requirements.
No records in the initial inquiry
Begin with non-identifying scope information. Secure transfer follows after the engagement is confirmed.
A defined boundary
Validation answers whether the work is clinically supported.
A verification review does not become an independent omission search unless that scope is selected. Sierra Pacific identifies the review level, question, and limits before beginning so the deliverable matches the assignment.
Begin with a scoped inquiry
Ready to add an RN validation layer?
Start with the AI output, approximate page count, deadline, and the clinical question your team needs answered.